What is the crowd's opinion of Gitblit?

From 3.5 billion comments

Oh, nice!

I can't help but ask though, is it any different than gitbucket or gitblit?

I'm using gitbucket with LDAP for authentication, I can't say a bad thing about it so far.

The application.

You can tell that it's ui was done by a programmer :P

http://gitblit.com/screenshots/00.png

That screenshot in particular, with the 90's style tables look horrific. What's with the random "web 2.0" blue login button that looks completely out of place with the retro theme :/

I actually use gitblit. It was my parting gift at my old job. It's stable, never had issues with it, even with hundreds of users connecting. They still rave about it to me, even today. :-)

GitBlit

> Reflog

> Gitblit v1.2.1 introduced an incomplete reflog mechanism which was completed in 1.3.0. All pushes to Gitblit are automatically logged on an orphan branch, refs/meta/gitblit/reflog. If this ref exists, the reflog page link will be displayed on the repository pages.

> This reflog is similar to, but not the same as, the normal Git reflog. The Gitblit reflog links Gitblit accounts to ref changes and because it is stored on an orphan branch, the reflog is portable by the federation mechanism or by a normal git clone --mirror command.

It does not show up with bit branch -va. This is a screenshot of one of the commits that can be seen in the commit graph on the new software.

Thanks for the response, wasn't sure anybody would since for some reason this seems to be getting downvotted :(

So apparently GitBlit has a built-in ticket system, seems to have more features than bonobo in general as well. Setting up a test instance to check it out.

Bonobo has a cleaner looking UI but doesn't even have a diff built in. GitBlit has Lucene indexing!