What is the crowd's opinion of
scrible?
From 3.5 billion comments
4 reviews of this app found across the web:
> The term "incel" refers to a now-banned group on the message site Reddit, used by Rodger,
Soweit ich weiß ist es nicht bekannt ob er tatsächlich ein Account auf reddit hatte. Ich glaube sie meinen /r9k/, wo er sein Manifest pfostiert hat. Sie könntent aber auch die 'Misc' Sektion auf bodybuilding.com meinen, deren Demografie sich teilweise ( und auch nur früher, heute sehr viel weniger) mit der incel Philosophie überschneidet. Dort hat er wenige Tage vor dem Amoklauf einen Thread gepostet; http://www.scrible.com/contentview/page/QKQ00910J40OP22B1487K1BS4084G623:76214407/index.html.
Könnte auch sein das ich falsch liege und/oder den Satz fehl interpretiere.
He still doesn't know what Common Carrier means. Other than that... wow. He just stepped in it.
>I have a question about that—one of our writers had his details posted on an 8chan board, where we was being harassed. We later found a leaked message of you asking the board owner to remove the posts in order to receive nicer coverage from Ars Technica. Would you help someone being doxed or harassed if you weren’t hoping to get something out of it?
>I asked the board owner—I asked him if he would delete it. If he’d said no, and I decided to delete it, the next thing that would happen was he would make a post on the meta board—"Why did an admin delete that post? I’m really mad." And then, you know, as I said earlier, he would probably make a new board and start planning against me.
>That’s really all I can do. He’ll often say no. As I said, taking down the whole board doesn’t help. Same thing on reddit—the admins take down one board at reddit and another pops up. 8chan is an analogy of the internet, you know, because of how easy it is to create a new board.
>So, uh, that private message, you know. I did send it. It is what it is. And [the board admin] did comply.
Handy link for posterity / inevitable denials. This bold free speech warrior openly admits to intervening with his board's content to please the SJW media. What other shit has he asked to have taken down, and why? Same questions about what he left up. This kid's story has jumped the tracks, and if there's any internal consistency among the chanfucks, he's toast.
He'll be fine, in other words.
Some of Elliot Rodger's old comments on a bodybuilding forum:
>forum thread: Why do girls hate me so much?
>Dressing nice is better than having bulging muscles anyways. This isn't the ****ing stone age. Men shouldn't have to look and act like big, animalistic beasts to get women. The fact that women still prioritize brute strength just shows that their minds haven't fully evolved.
>Forum thread: Anyone here have an average penis and still get girls?
>The average is 5.5? I thought it was 4. This is very unsettling.
>Never insult the style of Elliot Rodger. I'm the most stylish person in the world. Just look at my profile pic. That's just one of my fabulous outfits. The sweater I'm wearing in the picture is $500 from Neiman Marcus.
>WHAT?! I am a beauty. How dare you. Girls should be fawning over me. You're just jealous.
The guy was fucked up in more ways than one.
I think above all his flaw was that he was unable to take or learn from criticism. All those people wanting to help him. People telling him to lift. And how did he react?
Read for yourself
> There's nothing cynical about it.
The OP here openly talks about the primary goal being to fuck with people. Come on, now.
> We have a grassroots network that allows
I'm good with that part. Just stop people from using it to mine salt and generate PR. Do it for its own sake.
>We asked Ablegamers
No, that isn't right. GG took steps to hide its involvement.
>AbleGamers' press release said that they rejected our money after they got tons of mail from people objecting to AG's contact with GG.
This isn't the case. They said they rejected the money when they found out it was coming from GG. This is a very important distinction. See previous link.
>I'm not "taking advantage" of your disability.
Bullshit. You saw that I had a disability and decided that would be a good "in" to spam long-sinced debunked talking points. You saw me as an angle of attack. You can say whatever you want, yo. I'm not an idiot and I've seen this before.
>No, what's disgusting and manipulative is denying disabled people access to resources because of salt over internet drama.
Tell that to Ablegamers. As I've linked, it was their decision.
>I genuinely dig you username
I like usernames that fuck with conspiracy people by their very existence. It's only worked once (check my post submission history; it's very brief) but it was fucking exquisite.